Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Probably a silly question....
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:07:16 +1300
References: <000801ccfd5a$332e2d50$998a87f0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CB7EE69A.1B577%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Perhaps that could be taken the next logical step, only had (possible) focus
shift if you took pictures...

Why all this pedantic talk, are you in the market for a Leica 35mm
Summilux-M?

john

-----Original Message-----

The previous version only had focus shift if you actually looked at the
pictures afterward.

--
> 
> Why? I have owned and been using the lens for over a year...
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Yes I was looking through some of them were you?
> 
> -- 
>> 
>> Google "35mm Summilux FLE" gets me 466,000 hits with Mr Rockwell at the
>> top....
>> 
>> john
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> Welli'd replied that the term FLE Is not used on the box but I'm also
> going
>> to say its not used very often at all to describe the lens by people on
>> chatgroups NOT on the box. Easy enough to check just search engines for
> 35mm
>> Summilux FLE and see how many hits you get.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Shorthand for people to know the difference in model, would you rather I
>> said
>>> that a 11663 was available?
>>> 
>>> john
>>> ________________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>> FLE is Zeiss.
>>> You'll not find it on a Leica box nor on a lens.
>>> Just think of it as "Fleiss".
>>> 
>>> 
> 




Replies: Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)
In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)