Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] MM - first impressions
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:34:49 +0200
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9950164BA@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99501E4FA@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAFfkXxuWASsWt12tQo7+KmDya6Vh8BWVP7yQpKer9SFOLNoEWg@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E995020739@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

Le 30 ao?t 12 ? 13:20, John McMaster a ?crit :

> So would people rather I do a set at 1200 - my usual larger size?

nope - good to see things as you do

OTT so far do you really feel it is worth the plunge when already  
owning an M9?

TIA
Philippe


> I do not think you see much at 1200 but I run high res monitors ;-)
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:00 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>  
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> http://johnmcmaster.com/Monochrom/Day_1/ - big images are 1800 pixels
>> on long side
>>
> Looks like they all played big.  Kinda hard to look at.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://sonc.com/look/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] MM - first impressions)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] MM - first impressions)
In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] MM - first impressions)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] MM - first impressions)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] MM - first impressions)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] MM - first impressions)