Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Monochrome II and III
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:32:30 +0930
References: <1346355327.98058.YahooMailClassic@web126006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E995E3EB5D@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <59903679-C0A8-40D7-81C9-3F068A3DFC70@archiphoto.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E995E4C1B9@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <658DA0E6-B6A2-4230-AC34-E648768B7C95@archiphoto.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E995E4C6CC@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <57B9287A-F050-4DD6-AA78-798AFE917923@archiphoto.com> <CA+yJO1A4Z01DHPTPYP0emMOEKgHZKmV4_vWxJO2-GahX0t7=_g@mail.gmail.com>

One of my M8s hits the buffer all the time and the other doesn't.
Ever.  I use them exactly the same.  I don't know enough to understand
how it can happen, but I also noticed with the dozen or so M9s I have
played with that some are 'fast' and some are 'slow'.

Marty


Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
In reply to: Message from douglasnygren at yahoo.com (Douglas Nygren) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Monochrome II and III)