Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] MM - first impressions
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:19:13 -0500
References: <CC66E6F2.22FFE%mark@rabinergroup.com>

And if you're a professional photographer unattached to a studio or darkroom 
or office, this camera looks sweet. I'm not, so I'll look at her stuff.

Sent from my iPad

Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, Louisiana
USA

On Aug 31, 2012, at 21:10, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> So if you were into Leica on a walking the walk and not just talking the
> talk basis the glass you would most likely have would easily justify a 7 or
> 8 grand body.
> 
> The new .9 Noct cost 11 grand usd
> The APO-Summicron-M 50mm ASPH  cost 7
> The 21mm f/1.4 Summilux-M Aspherical cost 7
> Tri-Elmar-M 16-18-21mm f/4 Aspherical  cost 6.2
> 35mm f/1.4 Summilux-M Aspherical Lens cost 5
> Zeiss CZ 15mm f/2.8 Distagon T* ZM  cost 4.6
> Summicron-M 28mm f/2.0 Lens 4.2
> 
> Mark Rabiner
> 
>> From: Alan Magayne-Roshak <amr3 at uwm.edu>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:06:03 -0500 (CDT)
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] MM - first impressions
>> 
>> $7,900 is insignificant?  And it doesn't even deliver quality right out 
>> of the
>> box without extra adjustments and expense?
>> 
>> I live in another world.
>> 
>> Alan
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] MM - first impressions)