Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ansel Adams Wilderness
From: roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:19:56 -0700
References: <CC6FDECA.234AD%mark@rabinergroup.com> <504F04FC.20702@summaventures.com> <4C78942D-31AE-40E8-AE80-4C1640CD885C@mac.com>

An interesting thread.

I went to a symposium at UC Santa Barbara.  The high end physics
department, headed by a Nobel prize winning physicist, also has an
artist on staff.  At this large conference on art, the only talk that
impressed me was by the Nobel prize winner.  His theme was: art
exists, what does that tell us?

I think my style of photography emphasizes, among other things, the
amount of information that is accessible by the viewer.  Photography
is a form of visual communication.  The more information I can present
to the viewer, the more I can communicate.  The more interesting
information in the print, the longer I can keep the viewer engaged.

Taking pictures in the field is my "information capture" phase.  I
need to capture the most in the most efficient manner that gives me
otherwise what I need or want.  In my random walk through this field,
I have selected the instruments and workflows that have met those
goals.  The M9 with my 35mm lens is at the top of the heap now.

Photoshop became the core of the post-processing some time ago.

Internegs and traditional silver printing had their short reign, and
now it's inkjet with carbon for high end and dyes for ultimate eye
candy.  I sure wish I could combine those, but then again, market
divisions actually increase the market.

I suspect what I'm doing, in part, is simply using the tools that
present themselves due to the technology of the day.  I use the tools
to accomplish or facilitate a photographic journey that is, I think, a
part of being one of those "compulsive communicators," as someone once
defined us humans.

I think whatever it was that caused people to love to look at large
format photographs will also cause those types of people to look at
prints that have the massive amounts of information that we can
capture with multiple frames.  But, when a single frame on an M9 can
accomplish the same thing, all the better (and it can much of the
time).  Part of multi-frame workflows stems from the need to capture
information beyond what a single frame can, and much relates to the
ability to reduce the equipment load and costs.  It is, in part, a
light and superior solution to wide angle zooms and their problems.


Paul
www.PaulRoark.com


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Ansel Adams Wilderness)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Ansel Adams Wilderness)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Ansel Adams Wilderness)