Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Big news D600 and RX1 - Rabs
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:54:28 +0200
References: <CC778798.23824%mark@rabinergroup.com> <FED3B576-41D0-4DB4-A01E-868DCAC2F570@sfr.fr> <2990F72A-7547-4E5E-87A8-E867F9046A49@gmail.com>

Thanks to you Dear Doctor Steve

I'm happy you also were In the Mood

Amiti?s
Philippe, Andrew, & sisters


Le 13 sept. 12 ? 22:22, Steve Barbour a ?crit :

>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:25 AM, "philippe.amard"  
> <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote:
>
>> I don't usually use auto ISO - it is one parameter too many - I  
>> want to control noise and preserve the dynamic range
>>
>> Else, my shot was a test using Moonlight Serenade light only, when  
>> I got the camera.
>>
>> Your faithfully
>> Philippe G. Miller
>
>
> Dear Mr Miller,
>
>
> thank you for your delightful post,
>
>
> Steve Barbour
>
>
>>
>> Le 13 sept. 12 ? 18:52, Mark Rabiner a ?crit :
>>
>>> To me it means its your high end when you're shooting at auto iso.
>>> Which is the case now with a D700 which I use now.
>>> The auto iso only goes up to 6400. Turn off the auto iso and it  
>>> goes up much
>>> further. I got the point that it did not look so great higher than  
>>> 6400 as a
>>> result. And as I don't think I've ever used the camera not at auto  
>>> iso I
>>> never found out. But I never had some amazingly low light thing  
>>> where I had
>>> to use a higher shutter speed or stop down more so I was not  
>>> inspired to
>>> turn the auto iso off and try.
>>>
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>> Photography
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Philippe Amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr>
>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:29:18 +0200
>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Big news D600 and RX1
>>>>
>>>> Same on the D700 and in practical terms it means that I try to keep
>>>> below 6400 if I want a photo and not a recording of what was  
>>>> there cf
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2011/2011-PAW-01-+waking+up+to+a
>>>> +new+year-0083-9.jpg.html
>>>> (shot at 5.6 in the dark though see exif)
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps
>>>> Ph
>>>>
>>>> Le 13 sept. 12 ? 18:01, Robert Baron a ?crit :
>>>>
>>>>> I am reading this new Nikon D600 has standard ISO up to 6400,
>>>>> expandable to
>>>>> 25600.
>>>>>
>>>>> In practical terms for someone who wants to shoot in low light,  
>>>>> what
>>>>> does
>>>>> this 'standard' vs. 'expanded' mean?
>>>>>
>>>>> --Bob
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Big news D600 and RX1)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Big news D600 and RX1 - Rabs)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Big news D600 and RX1 - Rabs)