Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:21:56 +0530
References: <CAF8hL-HNfVNYGWcvWd_NaK5-=czJ1OeSUAtVJcTSXQq=gRSU+Q@mail.gmail.com>

After all this passionate analysis, I wonder how many of us in the group 
will actually will buy this all singing all dancing machine called the Leica 
M? I know I might have if only it had autofocus - without is a non starter 
with my eyes being what they are!
Cheers
Jayanand

Sent from my iPad

On 20-Sep-2012, at 7:06 AM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> 
wrote:

> ... and why not?! Leica can afford to make expensive full frame small size
> telephone for the new M, with EVF.
> 
> This is like the ultimate camera. Want small size? Use a small 35 or 50.
> 
> Want to use it in low light? You have all these 'lux and Nocti
> 
> Want to use it for telephoto? Start with the R adapter, and then they will
> sell you even more newer and better lens, designed for the M...
> 
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica M 135/2, 180/2, 250/2...)