Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison
From: billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:15:03 -0500
References: <CAG8EVmwZHx6XRYsYRHucAcCEocTJKf8OwyTd4JAUvV_jCq3qzw@mail.gmail.com><80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E996585213@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org><4CFAD5F822354E6B89705500125C1A4F@qck8vqhgou8blu><55E7BE2185474584998C0516760837F6@qck8vqhgou8blu><CAH1UNJ3+d_L6KprKdgm4-d42MGOq8Q1352DE23k4grhDDh5qQw@mail.gmail.com> <98B916AB82664275B8149A73CBC2104B@qck8vqhgou8blu>

My only personal experiences with these ranges is owning the 18 and 21 for 
the OM and the 17-35 for my Nikons. With the OM, I found the 18 of little 
value except for interiors, while the 21 was always with me and frequently 
on the camera. With the Nikkor, being a zoom made things a little different, 
with the 17 end more useful on construction sites, but the ability to widen 
just a bit at the longer ranges saved shoe leather.

Were I in a position to spend the money on the Zeiss lenses (and I love the 
ones I have and the ones I had) I would get the 21 without reservation. 
Maybe you should rent one or both.

-----Original Message----- 
From: A. Lal
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:27 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison

I've never used the 18mm, but I still have most of the fast wides for Contax
RTS, including the 21/2.8 for the Contax RTS - it is a wonderful lens.  I
also have the 14-24 Nikkor and am extremely pleased with it. It will not
accept filters directly, of course.

If size and weight are  important, I would go with just one prime CZ WA
lens.  If an 18 is needed then it is irrelevant if the 21 is better. The
14-24 is at its best at the shorter end of its range if tests  are to be
believed.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jayanand Govindaraj" <jayanand at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison


> Akhil,
> There is a world of a difference between the Zeiss 18mm and Zeiss 21mm, 
> the
> latter being streets ahead on every count. Lloyd Chambers (Digilloyd), who
> tests Zeiss lenses exhaustively, has found the 14-24 better in every
> respect to the Zeiss 18mm, and finds the Zeiss 21mm marginally better than
> the Nikon 14-24mm set at 21mm.
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:00 PM, A. Lal <alal at poly.edu> wrote:
>
>> Here's a test of both lenses on, of all things, a FF Canon body:
>>
>> http://www.ephotozine.com/**article/carl-zeiss-21mm-f-2-8-**
>> and-nikon-14-24-f-2-8-lenses-**are-put-to-the-test--review-**11118<http://www.ephotozine.com/article/carl-zeiss-21mm-f-2-8-and-nikon-14-24-f-2-8-lenses-are-put-to-the-test--review-11118>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "A. Lal" <alal at poly.edu>
>>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:42 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison
>>
>>
>>  On-line tests suggest that the CZ 18mm and 21mm WA primes top the 14-24
>>> optically. Interestingly, the Nikkor zoom costs about the same as each 
>>> CZ
>>> prime.
>>> AS an example see:
>>>
>>> Photozone.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John McMaster" <john at 
>>> mcmaster.co.nz>
>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:34 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison
>>>
>>>
>>>  Look on getdpi.com, a few people who have/had both......
>>>>
>>>> For quality the Zeiss I think.
>>>>
>>>> john
>>>> ______________________________**__________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HI All,
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone offer comments based on experience, comparing a Zeiss 18 to 
>>>> a
>>>> Nikon 14-24?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Leo Wesson
>>>>
>>>> Mail was checked for spam by the Freeware Edition of CleanMail.
>>>> The Freeware Edition is free for personal and non-commercial use.
>>>> You can remove this notice by purchasing a full license!
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See 
>>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>>>  
>>>> more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See 
>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>>  
>>> more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  
>> more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison)
In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison)