Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Polly and Laura, II
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:40:40 -0500 (CDT)

Tina,

Both are good, but my preferences are for the unprocessed photo.  The SFX 
version is very good, but seems harder/harsher than the unprocessed version 
which has a comfy softness and nicer mood to it.

Cheers,
Gene

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net>
To: MUGers at yahoogroups.com, "lug" <lug at leica-users.org>, "paw" <paw at 
micapeak.com>, "seephoto" <seephoto at micapeak.com>, "Olympus Camera 
Discussion" <olympus at thomasclausen.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:52:29 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Polly and Laura, II

PESO:

Thanks for all of the comments on Polly and Laura!  Here is the next shot
in that series, unmanipulated, straight conversion to jpeg in LR:

http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/146619111

You can switch back and forth between the two:

http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/146602122

Is it better with the Silver Efex treatment, or not?

TIA for any comments and criticisms.

Tina
-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information