Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Instamatic Filter Argument
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:48:57 -0500
References: <CA+yJO1AkT5ZR36GEaad=66LRvg77aSn79X_rGfCKOik+dd+zYg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Tina,

I somewhat agree with his point of view.  That is the reason I modified the 
Covered Bridge photo to sepia before I posted it a few days ago.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net>
To: <MUGers at yahoogroups.com>; "lug" <lug at leica-users.org>; "paw" 
<paw at micapeak.com>; "seephoto" <seephoto at micapeak.com>; "Olympus 
Camera 
Discussion" <olympus at thomasclausen.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 5:07 PM
Subject: [Leica] Instamatic Filter Argument


> PESO:
>
> Interesting article:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/14/opinion/hernandez-mobile-photography/index.html?hpt=hp_c1
>
> "Because I know that time cannot touch my digital images, I add in the
> passage of time by using filters."
>
> Lots of comments pro and con.
>
> Tina
> -- 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Instamatic Filter Argument)