Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Review of Fuji's new X-E1 with zoom lens.
From: gerry.walden at me.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:59:29 +0000
References: <CAF8hL-E202qc339vjfVATJT+rtzpLzY6dR5N43yv=ff_CRN5ow@mail.gmail.com> <CCC6598C.260E2%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CAH1UNJ1+5megM6=KSCbkhwW8x0aMNx_pkugWa_7_qf5X5=ELXQ@mail.gmail.com>

;>)

Gerry

Gerry Walden
+44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
+44 (0)797 287 7932
www.gwpics.com

On 12 Nov 2012, at 13:36, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote:

> "Against ignorance (and Confirmation Bias), the Gods themselves contend in
> vain" - with apologies to Friedrich Schiller (-:
> 
> Cheers
> Jayanand
> 
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Because when sensor technology gets better it raises the bar on the 
>> results
>> we get. No one sees it as a reason to not justify being able to now buy
>> cheap cameras..
>> We get now get better results from our Leica M and latest flagship cameras
>> from Canon and Nikon.  Serious photographers and top pros are not going
>> "now
>> I can shoot with a smaller sensor"  and stick with the results they got
>> five
>> years ago they are going "not I can get better results"
>> 
>> There is no movement for pros to be shooting with 1.5x crop or any other
>> crop camera. The predominance of full frame cameras for top pro and 
>> serious
>> amateur work is now even more so..
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photography
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:10:06 -0800
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Review of Fuji's new X-E1 with zoom lens.
>>> 
>>> Leica has always been about getting that last 5%. OTOH, for certain
>>> subjects or certain people's way of working, they can't get that 95%
>> anyway
>>> with Leica, hence the "best camera" won't do squat.
>>> 
>>> So... looking at pure "bigger is better" viewpoint, the Sony RX is very
>>> appealing, since it has a 35mm full frame sensor. However, the sensor
>>> manufacturers have demonstrated that today's sensors can vastly
>> outperform
>>> even sensors from a generation. i.e. did you think the D700 images were
>>> great?! Well, now you can get similar quality from an APS sensor and so
>> on
>>> and so forth.
>>> 
>>> So I'm afraid the time for a full frame "compact" has passed. If it was
>>> released 3 years ago, people would have flocked to it. Now? When you can
>>> get APS cameras with almost similar quality and other convenience, what
>>> would be the point?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Review of Fuji's new X-E1 with zoom lens.)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Review of Fuji's new X-E1 with zoom lens.)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Review of Fuji's new X-E1 with zoom lens.)