Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lew I never heard of this until I Googled after your post and found a couple of old forum posts. I think you mean the Tele Elmarit M not the later Elmarit M from 1990 onwards. That one itself was later discontinued and replaced by the Summarit M 2.5. I actually have two of those (just CLA'd). I have no idea on how common this reported problem actually was with those earlier lenses. Since production is reported to have finished in 1989 I would have thought any such problem would be there or not by now? They ought to be relatively cheap, if you could examine one you proposed to buy and were satisfied, I doubt that there is much risk. You might want to allow for that in how much you are prepared to pay of course?. Cheers, Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 18 November 2012 08:22, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm looking to pick up a 90/2.8 Elmarit-m so I'm learning about the etching > problem on the early, black mounts. Did Leica ever explain what caused > this, and, if I were to find a clean one without the etching, could I rely > on the idea that if it hasn't etched yet, it won't in the future? > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >