Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] So, wouldn't a 50mm Summicron LTM or 35mm f2 ASPH LTM be the best enlarging lens on earth?
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:30:33 -0600 (CST)
References: <CCD712B2.26A10%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I have a 40mm f4 El-Nikkor that covers 35mm.   I used it to make 20x24's, 
but it has been a long time since I made any that size.


On Nov 24, 2012, at 11:11 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> I used an 80 Nikkor for when I was printing 5x7's so the lens would not be
> right on top of the enlarging easel.
> 
> I used an 135mm for 4x5's and wallets.
> 
> And id use the 50 2.8 I think for very large prints like 16x20's and
> 20x24's.
> They covered. No fall off.
> 
> I got some great deals on German glass but by then the ink jetting was
> really kicking in and my darkroom was getting dusty.
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
>> From: Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:02:57 -0600 (CST)
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] So, wouldn't a 50mm Summicron LTM or 35mm f2 ASPH 
>> LTM be
>> the best enlarging lens on earth?
>> 
>> I use an 80mm 
>> Componon for both 35 and 2 1/4.
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 24, 2012, at 10:42 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> One of the first Axioms of photography is the huge difference between a 
>>> lens
>>> for a camera and a lens made for an enlarger.
>>> This is complicated by the fact that the thread size for most enlarging
>>> lenses is "Leica size".  Which is 39mm.
>>> Becuae in the  30's they either didn't know this very basic first axiom 
>>> or
>>> it was not the case yet. And people used their Elmars to first shoot the 
>>> pix
>>> then print it. An idea being the defects of the lens in the taking would
>>> cancel out itself in the printing. Like fall off for instance.
>>> 
>>> But now an exquisite German or top Nikkor enlarging lens can be traded 
>>> for a
>>> pair of old shoes.  And everything 35mm format shot you do with whatever
>>> lens Nikkor or Canon or Leitz passes through that enlarging lens.
>>> Its the most important camera gear buy there is. Bar none.
>>> Get an APO.
>>> Or a 63mm Nikkor which is what I used and still have.
>>> 
>>> The Picker people thought you needed an 80.
>>> 
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>> Photography
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> From: Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net>
>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:26:56 -0600 (CST)
>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] So, wouldn't a 50mm Summicron LTM or 35mm f2 ASPH 
>>>> LTM
>>>> be
>>>> the best enlarging lens on earth?
>>>> 
>>>> Does 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] So, wouldn't a 50mm Summicron LTM or 35mm f2 ASPH LTM be the best enlarging lens on earth?)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] So, wouldn't a 50mm Summicron LTM or 35mm f2 ASPH LTM be the best enlarging lens on earth?)