Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:56:38 -0500
 
I Googled "Flash SW" and came up with ziltch. No clue.

Mark William Rabiner


> From: Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:45:38 -0800
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
> 
> He meant Flash SW......  Not Flash-Light.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> 
> Wrong guy half my work is with flash at least before digital.
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
 In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)