Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:46:48 -0500

Again while Phil's woes seem to be way off the bottom of the graph Tina's
seem to be way off the top. Or visa versa. As a Leica optimist I'd love to
believe Tina's and totally ignore Phil's but can't totally do neither.

I think The new Digital M is going to work. And do a lot of fine work by a
lot of dedicated people.


Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:55:13 +1000
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
> 
> Am I still the only one astonished at Phil's report that all 10 M9 cameras
> in his circle have all needed repair several times??
> I cannot believe that is typical nor know of any other report of that level
> of failures (actually a 200 or 300% failure rate) to that effect anywhere
> in my years of Leica involvement (nor about any other brand either for that
> matter).
> I never suggested that the M9 is the best tool for professional
> photojournalists. It has no video for a first consideration.
> My comments were only on that reported failure rate.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use)