Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] A picture that should not have been taken
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:48:01 +0100
References: <142571BC-A616-4A3C-A7CC-7826C670FA5E@frozenlight.eu>
 
Yes Nathan,

Very sad!

Un abrazo
Lluis 



El 06/12/2012, a las 06:43, Nathan Wajsman escribi?:

> Or at least not been published.
> 
> As far as I am concerned, the photographer is a creep, as is, obviously, 
> the editor of the NY Post.
> 
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20611140
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> 
> 
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (W. R. Smith) ([Leica] A picture that should not have been taken)
 In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] A picture that should not have been taken)