Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A last version? (it begins to be funny!) http://tinyurl.com/ab4m57g Thank you, Richard. I miss a bit the backlight silhouette in the right side, but no doubt the image is clearly stronger. And thank you, Ken. Your advice about detail tools was very useful. Best regards, Marc -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+foto=marcdufour.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+foto=marcdufour.net at leica-users.org] En nombre de Richard Man Enviado el: jueves, 24 de enero de 2013 10:24 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Mosses, lichens and eucalyptus > Mark This image: http://tinyurl.com/a9f39lg Crop the right side off leave the left. I think that would make it a very strong image. On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Marc Dufour <foto at marcdufour.net> wrote: > Mark, > Some information which appears in the exif isn't real; the body and > lens don't fully communicate. > Yes regarding iso and speed, but not the aperture value, which is > probably the most closed I could, as I use to do. > About the iso, it's high enough for my taste, I prefer to don't risk > to get grain; and the lens for sure isn't the best for this kind of > approach (1:4/70-210) Maybe the option was to don't take the picture, > something I would haven't option to repeat in the future. > Thanks for your comment and interest. > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+foto=marcdufour.net at leica-users.org [mailto: > lug-bounces+foto=marcdufour.net at leica-users.org] En nombre de Mark > Rabiner > Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 23 de enero de 2013 23:16 > Para: Leica Users Group > Asunto: Re: [Leica] Mosses, lichens and eucalyptus > > I think the issue is not that its not shot close enough which some may > be thinking. But that It we shot wide open which is frustratingly > limiting the amount of very cool moss and lichen like information at > hand. > Your iso is only 2500. And your shudder speed is 170. > There is room to stop down and see more than a thin slice of detail. > > > On 1/21/13 12:18 PM, "Jim Hemenway" <jim at hemenway.com> wrote: > > > I don't agree... that triangle gives the image some physical depth. > > The image would otherwise be flat. > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > On 1/20/13 2:30 PM, David English wrote: > >> I like the texture and the color, but I think the light triangle on > >> the right of the image is competing for attention since it is > >> lighter than everything else. > >> David > >> On Jan 20, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Marc Dufour<foto at marcdufour.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> http://tinyurl.com/a9f39lg > >>> C&C welcome. > >>> Cheers, > >>> Marc > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > >>> information > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > >> information > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > -- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information