Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you for the comment, Nathan. You're quite right. I'm used to the M8's tonal rendition, and the OM-D has more dynamic range. That means the files look a bit flat "out of the camera," and need a bit more tweaking in PP to get things just right. Which I didn't do enough of, initially. I've tweaked most of the Joshua Tree pictures, and now they have a bit more pop. --Peter > The last two for me, Peter. Somehow, the light on the rocks looks a bit flat. > Cheers, > Nathan --- On Mar 3, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Peter Klein wrote: > Here are six of my best shots from my recent trip though the weird and > wonderful Joshua Tree National Park. This has got to be one of my > favorite places on earth. I keep going back, and I always find something > new. Getting in touch with my inner Ansel, but with a tiny OM-D EM-5 and > 20-25-45mm primes. (40-50-90mm equivalent). > > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/8525142605/lightbox> > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/8526257490/lightbox> > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/8525142297/lightbox> > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/8526257036/lightbox> > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/8526256844/lightbox> > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/8526256606/lightbox> > > More to come.