Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica 75mm Summilux vs 80mm Summilux-R?
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:24:56 -0700
References: <9441448.1362963991135.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <CAF8hL-HnGdxZZL_UFZtngqEoPsLaznLeDzkbgW0XRaT9eiVxBQ@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9B5352C85@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

Yes, but if anyone has the incentive to make a smart adapter, it would be
Leica so Doug Herr and others will not stay camping out at Solms/Wetzler
with pitchforks :-)


On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 6:11 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> Use of R lenses on the M(240) is not much different to Leitax or other
> mounts on Canikon IMO, just the stop down aperture matters less.
>
> john
> ________________________________________
>
>
> It's DEAD, Jim
>
> On the other hand, the future of the R lens, are with the M Type 240 and
> its derivatives.
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net
> >wrote:
>
> > Cedric Agie wrote:
> >
> > >>>
> >  the future of the R-systhem is uncertain.
> > <<<
> >
> > As I understand it the R-system's future is quite certain :(
> >
> > Doug Herr
> > Birdman of Sacramento
> > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Leica 75mm Summilux vs 80mm Summilux-R?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica 75mm Summilux vs 80mm Summilux-R?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica 75mm Summilux vs 80mm Summilux-R?)