Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:51:03 -0500
References: <CAF8hL-HJuiPn_SoqUvfm=HpGStA2NiB0Ftev+HPEae7G9oLMYA@mail.gmail.com>

At last!  Someone with shrubs more out of control than mine............... 
;~(

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:07 AM
Subject: [Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?


> This is really just a test to see if a commercial lab's processed 4x5 
> color
> neg has the color cast or not, and sure enough the colors are quite
> accurate. This means that my processing can be better still. I hope I can
> get the color cast problems resolved. I like the flexibility to shoot in
> color without the 6 steps needed to process slides...
>
> In any case, just a quick and fast 3200 DPI scan with the Epson flatbed.
> Imagine what it looks like with a proper drum scan (not that this
> particular image is worth it).
>
> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20130405-Scanned-18.jpg
>
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)