Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Studio fashion
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:35:35 -0500
References: <CAE3QcF7MZnFAHnf2ap4-1vOhWTE-_GV_d1Cufe00EkpmrRqzhQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Apr 9, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> First look from a new shoot at home with a new model today.
> M9 &Summilux 50 ASPH
> Sorry Ted I used 3 twinkie lights!
> 
> <http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/149597285>

this pose seems too unnatural for me.
might work if there were another figure (or even part of a figure) which she 
seems to be interacting with.

the "current look"
which I'm seeing in the publications coming to
the twenty somethings in my household
seem to striving for "natural"
even when a surreal sort of natural.
including such as:
<http://www.freepeople.com/>
<http://www.elle.com/news/fashion-accessories/luv-aj-baublebar-collaboration?click=news>
vogue
harpers bazaar
etc.

definitely enjoying your sharing these exercises.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Studio fashion)
Reply from leicaphong at gmail.com (Phong) ([Leica] IMG: Studio fashion)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Studio fashion)