Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there -Lew
From: ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 14:22:20 -0400
References: <28820410.1311582.1368983424137.JavaMail.www@wsfrf1134> <AD675E5A-CAEF-4433-921B-F57DB1031F1D@gmail.com> <F5BD30E6233149C5B4E9BFD2543427D9@Family> <DAC09F4B-B2CE-47B9-9CAC-11CFCD77DA0B@gmail.com>

i'm getting the same thing as Doug--I see that you are replying from your 
phone, but there is no addition to the message

see below

ric

On May 19, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> 
wrote:

> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> Steve Barbour
> 
> On May 19, 2013, at 10:53 AM, "Douglas Barry" <imra at iol.ie> wrote:
> 
> Steve, what part of this message is yours, and what part is Philippe's? I 
> have to admit the way these iPhone messages appear in nomal email is 
> somewhat bewildering to me. Don't know whether others have the same 
> problem. Anyone?
> 
> Douglas
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at 
> gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 6:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there -Lew
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> Steve Barbour
>> 
>> On May 19, 2013, at 10:10 AM, philippe.amard at sfr.fr wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Lew,
>> 
>> 
>> you're probably right at least when dealing with lenses faster than the 4 
>> - 5.6 marks,
>> which BTW tend to slowly be taken out of the shelves though - look at the 
>> many zoom lenses sold today, f4 is often wide open ... also WA and UWA, I 
>> don't know why though.
>> 
>> 
>> All of which still doesn't bring a clear answer as to why Mark wants (us) 
>> to shoot always at 5.6.
>> ******
>> the last two numbers of his social security number?
>> *******+
>> 
>> Amiti?s
>> Philippe, still there
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ========================================
>> 
>> Message du : 19/05/2013 18:17
>> De : "Lew Schwartz " <lew1716 at gmail.com>
>> A : "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Copie ? :
>> Sujet : Re: [Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there
>> 
>> 
>> Also, aren't a lot of 35mm lenses supposed to be sharpest at 4.0 - 5.6?
>> 
>> -Lew Schwartz
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:29 AM,
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you Marshall,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> this was known to me and actually sounds more of an urban legend 
>>> adressing
>>> trainees or freshmen PJs than anything else.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In addition it doesn't explain why Mark a contemporary experienced
>>> professional photog who has published in the NYT, insists on shooting 5.6
>>> and be there whatever the format.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> :-(
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Philippe, still willing to learn :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ========================================
>>> 
>>> Message du : 19/05/2013 06:11
>>> De : "Marshall Hunt "
>>> A : "Leica Users Group"
>>> Copie ? :
>>> Sujet : Re: [Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It is a modification of a motto from the early days of press photography,
>>> when you needed three hands and big pockets to use a Speed Graphic.
>>> :
>>> "f.6" set your Speed Graphic lens at 5.6 so you have some depth of field
>>> when you estimate the distance.
>>> 
>>> "and be there" be at the scene of the action; otherwise you can't get a
>>> fast shot.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:25 AM,
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Mark repeatedly writes:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> F 5.6 and be there.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> What's YOUR rationale for shooting at 5.6?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If it is about DoF it is completely irrelevant for it also depends on
>>>> sensor size, but this you know.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> So what is it please?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> AMiti?s
>>>> Philippe
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard at sfr.fr) ([Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there -Lew)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there -Lew)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there -Lew)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there -Lew)