Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 22:17:45 -0500
References: <CAEve6Xiz92RtAZd9u_FpBd2+w9nmsKCPux1OWbQ6LMtwofUb9w@mail.gmail.com> <CDC8640F.A2C1%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CABmfTOWWEscjvf3k3mbQv3sTSn0E+uFEcVrHi7=oho-hR710sg@mail.gmail.com> <7C585A4F-C9A6-4111-9B75-FBBB7C9F05BA@gmail.com> <CAFuU78f7MQsyP1Q6NAT5bhU32ENRHaNAj8YZpJXVCyNgQ84PpQ@mail.gmail.com>
On May 27, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote:
> I'm still not clear on what line is being crossed here. Is it the taking of
> the photographs or the possibility of making money?
not sure what "alleged" line is "allegedly" being crossed
to be determined
to be continued
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
In reply to:
Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] a photographer sued)