Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued - French rules for visitors ; -) ADDENDUM
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 22:53:01 +0200
References: <CDCCDD17.A6E2%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1E23A5D1-1D30-4B5F-B435-5BC9984602DB@frozenlight.eu> <ED0EE9B9C0FC43B4AE2DA554F505F2E8@billHP> <819FD883-57DE-4475-9F34-571E489FB386@frozenlight.eu> <D2FE16DA-F1FA-483F-AD81-EFE251CBAE20@sfr.fr> <08E41C64-9723-4BF2-8AEC-FBE8A125F7BC@frozenlight.eu>
Le 30 mai 13 ? 22:43, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit :
> Oh boy....I hope la gendarmerie never visit my web site.
>
:-)
If the person saw you taking the photo and didn't protest when she
could have, she is presumed to have accepted the "recording" (same
article)
Lorsque les actes mentionn?s au pr?sent article ont ?t? accomplis au
vu et au su des int?ress?s sans qu'ils s'y soient oppos?s, alors
qu'ils ?taient en mesure de le faire, le consentement de ceux-ci est
pr?sum?.
Publishing is another kettle of fish.
Relax, breath out ;-)
Amiti?s
Philippe
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
Replies:
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] a photographer sued - French rules for visitors ; -) ADDENDUM)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] a photographer sued - French rules for visitors ;-))
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] a photographer sued - French rules for visitors ;-))