Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have been trying to find a link to a message on the LuLa forum I read this week, it was scientific testing of colour response with cameras at increased speed ratings. To keep good colour you should not take a D800 over 1600asa, I think it was higher for the D4 and effectively unlimited on the Sony RX1, once you went over a certain level (they were response graphs) the colour depth dropped. john > -----Original Message----- > > so now the only reason to use low iso is for shallow depth of field > > is that so Jay? > > rric > > > On May 31, 2013, at 3:30 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> > wrote: > > > > > On May 31, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > > > >> ISO 12800: > >> http://gallery.leica- > users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/12800.JPG.html > >> > >> ISO 18100: > >> http://gallery.leica- > users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/18100.JPG.html > >> > >> ISO 25600: > >> http://gallery.leica- > users.org/v/jayanand/OddsAndEnds/D4Test/25600.JPG.html > >> > >> Please see LARGE. > >> > >> Discussions welcome. > > > > It would appear that this is the current "one-to-beat" in the realm of > > "high > ISO." > > > > Regards, > > George Lottermoser > > george at imagist.com > > http://www.imagist.com > > http://www.imagist.com/blog > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > >