Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:44:22 +0000
References: <CDF22427.C4B8%mark@rabinergroup.com> <C699DA1D-7C88-4C01-80CB-54876990F609@mac.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C56CD282@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>, <A8B26B6F-9B28-4374-B083-C166D96847A6@mac.com>

It is quite worn looking with +10K shots on it, my Leica dealer sells pretty 
ones with <5K shots on for about 4K USD - and that includes warranty and 
sales tax! So keeping it for the odd occasion I may want to be running two 
colour cameras or to re-pair with the Monochrom for common 
batteries/chargers if required. 

Oh course this is with the proviso of I do not need to sell it to raise 
funds.

john
________________________________________


On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:27 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> You do George, despite what I said about there being little difference in 
> results (for my usage) between the M9 and M I have not shot with the M9 in 
> the weeks since the M arrived....

I have followed everything you've said about the various camera bodies.
I wonder if you currently see any reason to keep the M9 - other than as fine 
backup body?

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)