Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nothing's wrong with the caption calling an M typ 240 a "vintage camera"?if the dateline is 2114! ;-) ?howard On Apr 4, 2014, at 4:57 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote: > Notice the caption of the photo ? The rest of the article is hardly more > accurate. > > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > On 5 April 2014 01:27, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: > >> LUG: >> >> This doesn't really answer anything: >> >> >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/why-leica-camera-decided-to-leave-its-beloved-r-series-behind/2014/04/04/4eacaa6a-b9ce-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html >> >> Don't really know why it merits an article in the Washington Post. >> >> Tina