Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree, was gibst? Sent from my iPhone Steve Barbour On Apr 23, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: If the price is the same (which sounds really weird) then you should obviously buy the M10 and not the M9. It has better high ISO performance, more functionality and is still supported by Leica with firmware upgrades. But still, I am amazed that any retailer would sell both cameras for the same price. Either their M9 price is absurdly high or their M10 price is absurdly low. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA > On Apr 23, 2014, at 8:01 PM, Roger Hart wrote: > > I've been away from the LUG for a bit, but am now interested in upgrading > from M8 for a full-frame M camera. I'm looking for any reasons LUGers might > have for not buying an M (besides price). I see that my favorite retailer > is selling M and M9 bodies at the same price. Are they equal cameras? Why > buy one over the other? I would love to hear some of our residents experts > weigh in on the topic. > > Thanks in advance. All the best from sunny Michigan. > > > Roger Hart > Ann Arbor > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information