Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/05/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why I refuse to pay more than 2000 Euro for a camera body
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 07:42:23 +0000
References: <8EB19795-F283-4D29-9522-100EE2784131@frozenlight.eu> <CF8B5722.42755%chris@chriscrawfordphoto.com> <C2836AD4-3D02-41FC-B303-EB6214530568@frozenlight.eu> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E6B54441@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>, <2FAFFBF3-E9A6-4DC8-A933-E1AEBD062A83@frozenlight.eu>

They (probably) would have, customers did not ;-)

john

________________________________________



Obviously, Leica UK knew something that you didn't, because the cashback 
rebates were very generous.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/



On May 4, 2014, at 8:59 AM, John McMaster wrote:

> AFAIR nobody expected the M9 until announced on 09/09/09?
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> I did not pay anything near that. At the time (late 2008), Leica had just 
> launched the M9 or was about to launch it, I don't remember, but in any 
> event there were good prices and cash rebates in the UK, so I ended up 
> paying 2150 GBP with 2-year Passport (one of the advantages of buying in 
> the UK), which at that time was about 2400 EUR. So yes, slightly above my 
> 2000 limit, but then again, it was a new camera with the best warranty 
> protection available in the market (and yes, I did have the opportunity to 
> use the Passport).
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
>
>
> On May 4, 2014, at 8:32 AM, Chris Crawford wrote:
>
>> Wasn't the M8 over $5000 new?
>>
>> --
>> Chris Crawford
>> Fine Art Photography
>> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>> 260-437-8990
>>
>> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio
>>
>> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
>> Become a fan on Facebook
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/3/14 5:03 AM, "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't visit Erwin Puts's site that much these days, but this
>>> morning I happened upon this:
>>>
>>> http://www.imx.nl/photo/blog-2/the-dark-side-of-digital.html
>>>
>>> Since my M8 is now 5 1/2 years old, this was of some interest to me.
>>> I have no doubt that when/if it fails, it will be a paperweight. And
>>> this is why I could not dream of paying the absurd prices being asked
>>> for new ME and M240 bodies. When I upgrade, it will to a second-hand
>>> M9, if the price is right.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Nathan
>>>


In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Why I refuse to pay more than 2000 Euro for a camera body)
Message from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] Why I refuse to pay more than 2000 Euro for a camera body)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Why I refuse to pay more than 2000 Euro for a camera body)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Why I refuse to pay more than 2000 Euro for a camera body)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Why I refuse to pay more than 2000 Euro for a camera body)