Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis, On my monitor, there is no doubt in my mind that the Epson scan is the best Cheers Jayanand On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:37 AM, George Lottermoser < george.imagist at icloud.com> wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote: > > > I would like know your opinions, I?m not quite happy with the B&W I?m > getting from my scanned latest films. In my opinion the first one I?ve > posted The highlights and shadows areas are too extremes and in the picture > the gray scale is very poor: > > > > Plustek Scanner, Vuescan and processed with Capture One 7Pro > > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301.jpg.html > > > > > > I?ve do two new versions: > > > > Plustek Scanner, Vuescan and processed with LR5 > > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301bisLR5.jpg.html > > > > > > Epson V700, Epson Software, processed in LR5 > > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301V700EPSoft001LR5.jpg.html > > > > > > What do you think? I Think I would choose the one with Plustek, Vuescan > and LR5 I like better the contrast and on the other hand with Vuescan I can > produce DNG files and this is much better. > > On my monitor this one displays best for my eyes > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301V700EPSoft001LR5.jpg.html > > > > I prefer the greater range of mid tones > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >