Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you Larry, As I?ve commented, if the photographer, the scanner, the software and the man who plays with these things is the same ?. the only things that could produce a differentresult are the film and developping. I think both are influencing, my opinion is based in that I?ve get better results with Ilford HP5 than Tri X, why? Simply because HP5 has no changed, maybe the developping shall be adjusted a little bit but not too much, I?ve found some persons here that they have stopped to use Tri X because it is no more the same. I will continue playing? Thank you lluis El 03/08/2014, a las 04:44, Larry Zeitlin via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> escribi?: > Lluis, > A while back I commented on the wonderful gradation you seemed to achieve > in your B&W shots. But the ones from the Capture One processing look like > drugstore pictures. All black and white with no middle tones. The > Plustek/LR5 processed photos have plenty of middle tones but no snap. The > best compromise, at least for me, seems to be the Epson V700 scanned > pictures processed in LR5. Although I think they too are a bit low key. Of > course my judgment is not baed on real prints but what I see on my Apple > monitor. But I would try to emulate your old style as much as possible. > Larry Z > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information