Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital M product no breakdown
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:40:02 -0700
References: <CAFuU78cxkqVhq4q0yo4QASxLLQDrRM4hShw4bt-h+0AKMet3Yg@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9010E9B1C77@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAF8hL-EoDeG9_WJSwHMYX1BQWthsbF=ugncKH3xQo6U2CstQ6g@mail.gmail.com> <54378BD0.5010507@gmx.de>

How about M Type 240 to be M10

then M-P could be M10-P

M Edition 60 can be
M10-for-people-with-way-too-much-money-even-more-than-usual

S is S3
S 007 is S4

How difficult can it be? :-)

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de>
wrote:

> They ought to use the suffix "K"
>
> 6K for 6,000 euros, 8K for 8,000 and so on;-)
>
> Douglas
>
>
>
> On 10.10.2014 02:47, Richard Man wrote:
>
>> When they started to call the products Leica M, and Leica S, Leica X etc.
>> some said, that will cause confusion! and Leicapjiles raised up and said,
>> no it won't, it's Leica M Type 240, and S 006 etc. Now we see the effect,
>> we have
>> Leica M, M-P which is different from MP, M Edition 60, M this and that.
>>
>> So much clearer now!! Ha!
>>
>> Give me the old M2, M3, M4, M4P etc. naming any day!
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:42 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  10770/10772 black and the others chrome. So just look at what is new with
>>> the M-P (240) over the M(240) and see if you want to pay for that, then
>>> choose your finish ;-)
>>>
>>>      Scratch resistant display-cover made of sapphire glass
>>>      Long-lasting readiness to capture due to a large double sized image
>>> buffer of 2GB (possible to shoot up to 24 images in full continuous speed
>>> of 3 fps)
>>>      Pure look without the Leica Logo and "M" lettering on the front side
>>>      Manual viewfinder frame selection with the traditional 'frame
>>> selector'
>>>
>>> john
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>> Any place I can go to view the differences between 10770 , 1, 2, 3
>>> etc...?
>>> The Leica website is less than helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Lew Schwartz
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
// https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits


In reply to: Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)