Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Comparing Summicron Collapsible and Rigid
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:37:19 +0100
References: <691D806F-5CF8-4978-A732-CC92EE7320C6@gmail.com> <147ACEEE-683E-4187-A415-BB22074F601D@frozenlight.eu> <A55B8787-9964-4461-ACFD-4632ACF8A7A7@sfr.fr> <2729153E-80B2-4673-AD83-B9825BD110E8@gmail.com>

I'm back at Metz tonight - And there's a big difference of rendition  
between my two macs - I think you edit  and process on the same mac as  
mine here, and the difference is less striking tonight. The four of  
them looks "sweeter" here than at Mutz where the first two nearly look  
harsh and colder (I mean the tones, not the temperature ;-).

Amities Bandido, et bonne semaine

Philippe


Le 7 d?c. 14 ? 20:30, Lluis Ripoll a ?crit :

> Merci Philippe,
>
> As I have commented, I had no intention to do a test, both are nice  
> and I find interesting comparing them.
>
> Amiti?s
> Lluis
>
> El 07/12/2014, a las 10:34, Philippe <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> escribi?:
>
>>
>> The second lens is much less aggressive as rendered here.
>> I'll have a second look tonight on the other Mac
>>
>> Both pairs are nice Lluis, fear not the bokeh devil in me ;-)
>>
>> Amities
>> Philippe @Mutz
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07 Dec 2014, at 01:12, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at 
>>> gmail.com 
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> In different days in the same place, aperture was 2.8 in all  
>>>> cases (except the second picture the EIXIF indicates 2.4), with  
>>>> Leica MM
>>>>
>>>> Also same photographer and same film?.he?he..
>>>>
>>>> The two first are with Summicron Collapsible
>>>>
>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141204_L1001505LR5.jpg.html
>>>>  
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141204_L1001506LR5.jpg.html
>>>>  
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> The two second with the Summicron Rigid
>>>>
>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141030_L1000188LR5.jpg.html
>>>>  
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141030_L1000189LR5.jpg.html
>>>>  
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> I want repeat the test, doing it the same day and same  
>>>> processing, but in my opinion the renditions are different, the  
>>>> collapsible gives more Contrast and the Rigid more smoothness and  
>>>> grey tones.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for looking, your c&c will be appreciated
>>>>
>>>> Saludos cordiales
>>>> Lluis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE






In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Summicron Collapsible and Rigid)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Comparing Summicron Collapsible and Rigid)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe) ([Leica] Comparing Summicron Collapsible and Rigid)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Summicron Collapsible and Rigid)