Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/08/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Your opinions please
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 12:39:49 -0700
References: <DDA1D8F8-ABDD-4938-8BE4-4C7B18857BDB@gmail.com>

Hi Luis,
 I have no doubt and without question, Tina and George have already given
the best answer possible!

I agree with their advice for sure.

cheers,
Ted

-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf 
Of
Lluis Ripoll
Sent: August-02-14 11:48 AM
To: Leica Users Group; MUGers at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Leica] Your opinions please

I would like know your opinions, I'm not quite happy with the B&W I'm
getting from my scanned latest films. In my opinion the first one I've
posted The highlights and shadows areas are too extremes and in the picture
the gray scale is very poor:

Plustek Scanner, Vuescan and processed with Capture One 7Pro
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301.jpg.html>

I've do two new versions:

Plustek Scanner, Vuescan and processed with LR5
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301bisLR5.jpg
.html>

Epson V700, Epson Software, processed in LR5
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301V700EPSoft
001LR5.jpg.html>

What do you think? I Think I would choose the one with Plustek, Vuescan and
LR5 I like better the contrast and on the other hand with Vuescan I can
produce DNG files and this is much better.

Thank you very much!

Saludos cordiales
Lluis


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Your opinions please)