Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Opinions Wanted: Sharp or Fuzzy?
From: skalte at icloud.com (Susan Ryan)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:04:00 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-FAL83+RwX9O-Xp16ZKttNL_S9MH2T+Lf2ceh2MbRoqpw@mail.gmail.com>

I prefer sharp. fuzzy seems a little gimicky. I am a fan of non-sharp 
generally speaking, for what it's worth.

Sue



> On Dec 16, 2014, at 3:14 AM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I am starting to do a series on "Old Buildings that have not been Torn Down
> Yet" (*may be slightly tongue in cheek*) Anyway, I am considering whether
> to use one of those old style fuzzy-lens to get certain effect and feelings
> across. Attached are 2 pics from the fuzzy-lens and 2 from normal 4x5 lens.
> The Stanford Theater shows up on both set so can serve as nice comparison.
> 
> What are you opinions? Which "style" speak to you more? I know the "correct
> answer" is which one *I* prefer, but  like to hear others' opinions. 
> Thanks.
> 
> SHARP!
> 
> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20141205-Scanned-645.jpg
> 
> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20141215-Scanned-654.jpg
> 
> FUZZY
> 
> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20141215-Scanned-652.jpg
> 
> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20141215-Scanned-653.jpg
> 
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> // https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Opinions Wanted: Sharp or Fuzzy?)
Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Opinions Wanted: Sharp or Fuzzy?)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Opinions Wanted: Sharp or Fuzzy?)