Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The myths of crop factor
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:51:37 -0800
References: <20103173.1420521312119.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Or crap factor :-)

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Montie <montoid at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Maybe we should call it the "Crock" Factor
> ;-)
>
> Montie
>
> John McMaster wrote:
> >>So getting close to a well composed APS-C size ;-)
>
>
> From: Mark Rabiner
>
> >  A 20% crop is nothing for me.
>
>
>
> > I used to balk when people would say a DSLR replaced a Hasselblad.
> > Now I half agree with it.
>
> I have said that my handheld M9 shots were sharper than tripod mounted
> Hasselblad B&W negs but lacked the same tonal range, then the Monochrom was
> released...
>
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
// https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits


In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie) ([Leica] The myths of crop factor)