[Leica] Long term M7 satisfaction?

[ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)]

I've found my M7 as reliable as my M6

I find the  M7 is also quieter than the M6

I've found the DX reader unreliable, so I set ISO of film manually

M7 has a HUGE advantage over the M6 if you do very long (2-30-second) 
exposures

ric carter




> On Jan 13, 2015, at 10:38 AM, Mitch Zeissler <zeissler at mac.com> wrote:
> 
> This is to all the M7 users out there.  
> 
> I've been searching high and low online for anecdotes of long term M7 
> reliability and satisfaction (and I'm talking years, not a few days, 
> weeks, or months).  I know about the early issues with the mechanical DX 
> reader, the switch to the MP viewfinder later in production, etc.  What 
> I'm interested in is whether the M7 is more/same/less reliable than an M6, 
> M6 TTL, or MP, particularly the electronically controlled shutter 
> curtains.  Anytime I read about an M7 issue, it's usually followed by a 
> dog pile of non-M7 users just dragging it through the mud ? like it's the 
> modern version of the M5. 
> 
> I've got an M7 and like it, though I've only had it for a few months (it 
> has the optical DX reader [useless for my bulk loaded film] and the MP 
> viewfinder upgrade).  I've also got an MP and like it.  I bought both used 
> in great condition, each at an excellent price, and they both date back to 
> 2002-2004.  
> 
> I recently discovered that my primary hand meter (a Sekonic L-308DC) 
> doesn't measure nearly as well in very low light as the M7 does.  
> Actually, the hand meter didn't measure anything at all (ISO 50 @ f/1.2), 
> while the M7 gave a reading of 3.5 seconds.  I've since confirmed this 
> repeatedly; once the light gets dim, the M7 begins to really shine and is 
> able to shots I simply cannot obtain with the MP.  I've got other hand 
> meters and have tested them with the same results. 
> 
> Up to this point I've been leaning toward the MP and hand meter combo as 
> my primary camera.  I'm asking because whichever route I go ? MP, M7, or 
> the new M-A ? I'll want a second body of the same model.  That way I can 
> have a different emulsion in each camera (B+W in one and color in the 
> other), and one body can always be used as a backup whenever the other is 
> being serviced. 
> 
> So based on the low light metering, I'm now flip-flopping on the M7 and 
> whether to rely on it as my main camera.  An M7 would give me all sorts of 
> benefits that the other M bodies would not, but it seems to be treated 
> like the red-headed step-child of the modern M cameras. 
> 
> What is your experience with the M7?  Has it had the same level of 
> reliability as the M6 or other M bodies?
> 
> If you don't want an M7 dog pile here, please send me a response privately 
> ? either way, I'd like to hear about your long term M7 experience. 
> 
> Mitch Zeissler
> ===
> Website: http://exploratorius.us
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information