Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2015/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Nathan's PAD 31/1/2015: the human face of the crisis
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 20:56:16 +0100
References: <EF6D4CA9-454C-4F6C-AACC-8E7A8A07EC78@frozenlight.eu> <CAH1UNJ25KvL_igiJbGYCUkHXOF8x=j7spM46feZBES0+eK3HOQ@mail.gmail.com> <C8707EF0-729A-4211-B3D0-089EC8C021A0@frozenlight.eu> <CAH1UNJ08BCv-5_53poWoFDz8SyxEM8LYpa6heUzCb2LESuyLAA@mail.gmail.com> <3A1985E1-8E3C-4A2D-A2AD-A53F4FB74083@btinternet.com>
Not just you Frank, not just you
:-)
Amities
Philippe
Le 2 f?vr. 15 ? 12:02, Frank Dernie a ?crit :
> I have always thought the concept of ?caveat emptor? was a thieves
> charter/conmans dream, in as much as effectively the law is saying
> that if you have dealt with a thief, or other criminal, and you did
> not notice yourself that they were criminals that the loss is your
> own fault.
> As a person who has almost always had dealings with honest,
> trustworthy people I find the idea that Caveat emptor could be a
> legal defence hateful. But that is just me!
> cheers,
> Frank D.
In reply to:
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 31/1/2015: the human face of the crisis)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 31/1/2015: the human face of the crisis)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 31/1/2015: the human face of the crisis)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 31/1/2015: the human face of the crisis)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 31/1/2015: the human face of the crisis)