Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This would not be the first time Mark opines about something with which he has no experience. Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator YNWA > On 10 Feb 2015, at 22:30, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote: > > Mark you don't sound very familiar with Lightroom's capabilities! > It is a better and more capable tool than Photoshop in many ways. > Photoshop of course has developed as an enormously capable and complex > program. It also has aspects completely irrelevant to many photographers. > Notwithstanding the digital asset management capacity, purely as an image > development tool, while using the identical raw processing engine, it > provides some faster and better options than Photoshop with some important > advantages too. > Try it for free (for 30 days I think) if you do want to learn what it can > do. > Or describe your typical steps in Ps currently starting with a new > photoshoot set? > > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > On 11 February 2015 at 07:05, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> > wrote: > >> I do think the top photogs and serious amateurs who use Lightroom not just >> as a starting point but as a finishing point on all their image >> processing >> are not the same people who honed all their images in Photoshop since the >> early 1990's. To those photogs Photoshop is not such an easy thing to give >> up for a contact sheet program with a bunch of image processing sliders >> added on later. >>