Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] QRY: Feedback needed on crop
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 09:55:03 -0700
References: <4BD16496-6166-4374-8CA4-122522965573@sfr.fr> <182688601.118211473.1432572605763.JavaMail.zimbra@mchsi.com>
 
> 
> TIA for letting me know which of these crops works better, if either does, 
> and why if you have time to explain.
> FYI, my doubts come from a different perception when seen small or large, 
> so thanks for your precious feedback.
> 
> SWH 2 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Doulce+France/Somewhereheim--2.jpg.html
> SWH 3
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Doulce+France/Somewhereheim--3.jpg.html
> 

I find the first more natural to my eye, less flattened and oppressive 
Phiilippe....

comme tu sais, plus ou moins...



:-)

s








> Amities
> Philippe, sorry for duplicates.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe) ([Leica] QRY: Feedback needed on crop)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] QRY: Feedback needed on crop)