Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hasselblad question to George L
From: george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:12:46 -0500
References: <AF6AACE8-2121-49D6-8741-83FAC5A87DEF@verizon.net>

Any finder that fits a 500, 500 C, 500 CM, would work with my CF-39 (I don't 
have the CFV-39) back. I believe the same would hold true for the CFV backs; 
as the backs all have a "low" profile where things may interfere with a 
finder. These backs are not like the old polaroid backs.

I suppose one or more of these backs may be too "thick" and make it 
difficult for one to get one's eye to one of the 90 degree view finders. I 
don't know about that. I've only ever used the waist level, 45 degree 
prisms, and currently the magnifying hood (which provides the best focusing 
- for me).

a note off the iPad, George

On Sep 19, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Frank Verizon <red735i at verizon.net> wrote:

> George: on the chance that you might know the answer to this question.....
> 
> I remember that you have a Hasselblad with CFV39 back.
> 
> The question to you is.... What 90 degree prisms fit your particular 
> Hasselblad combination?
> 
> There is contrary information available on the Web.  
> 
> Thank you for your time.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Hasselblad question to George L)
In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Verizon) ([Leica] Hasselblad question to George L)