Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] BIG new Leica
From: leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:08:48 -0700
References: <CAFfkXxuPQRq2bGQCAcfvCdJ_cDidre6fPSOG8NK4xtAOAampEw@mail.gmail.com> <562875E2.1020405@jayburleson.com> <CAGHtf7Gs83fEoB9bN30MrF1S6bupv7G+fREwO=cXNUNfCoQnew@mail.gmail.com>

On paper, pretty much the same size as my D750 and just a few grams 
different in mass.  Quite a bit larger than the Sony and very much more 
massive.  All without the lens.

Aram Langhans
(Semi) Retired  Science Teacher
& Unemployed photographer
 
?The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself 
would ever have dared dream.?   James D. Watson


-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Duprey [mailto:geneduprey2015 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:08 PM
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Subject: Re: [Leica] BIG new Leica

Definitely smaller than a Nikon D4, and looks like just a smidgen larger 
thant eh Sony.  Doesn't look that big to me.

Gene


On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com>
wrote:

> IMHO, it's perfect. The Sony (and the Olympus) is too small.
>
> Jay
>
> On 10/21/2015 6:06 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
>
>> I said it is BIG!
>>
>>
>> http://www.photographyblog.com/news/leica_sl_vs_sony_a7r_ii_side_by_s
>> ide_comparison/
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from geneduprey2015 at gmail.com (Gene Duprey) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)