Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Help! How many Megapixels needed?
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:14:27 -0700
References: <9680409.1446051851461.JavaMail.root@mswamui-valley.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <CA+yJO1DqL6JpperQ1OWRftLkU1jvk2irqYt-diTybO-G+VBdWA@mail.gmail.com>

If your goal is no larger than 16x20", then a 12-16 MP sensor would be
sufficient. For film, then you do need the best film/lens combination,
unless you do not mind the grain.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> 
wrote:

> I agree, discounting the appeal of film which has its own characteristics.
> I would never compare Kodachrome to digital and expect to get similar
> results. Kodachrome doesn't enlarge the same at all.  With digital the
> grain does not interfere with the image, with Kodachrome, the grain defines
> the image.
>
> Tina
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at 
> earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Larry Zeitlin wrote:
> >
> > >>>
> > For people that want to produce 11? x 14? to 16? x 20? prints or publish
> > their work in most consumer magazines, not display gigantic Colorama
> sized
> > prints from minuscule portions of the frame area, does the number of
> pixels
> > really matter? Inquiring minds want to know.
> >         Larry Z
> > <<<
> >
> > Yes and no.  For prints up to 18" x 24" (I haven't printed larger) the
> > DMR's 10MP has been adequate to make gallery owners swoon, and there's no
> > way I'd try printing a Kodachrome image that size and expect similar
> > quality.
> >
> > OTOH one of the stock agencies I'm working with has minimum pixel
> > requirements and the DMR's 10MP doesn't leave a lot of headroom for
> > cropping.  The a7II's 24MP gives me a lot more cropping flexibility.
> YMMV.
> >
> > Doug Herr
> > Birdman of Sacramento
> > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> > http://doug-herr.fineartamerica.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Tina Manley
> http://
> <
> http://t.sidekickopen23.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=f1f357f0-df6b-4252-c4ef-6fb9e7c7adeb
> >
> www.tinamanley.com
> http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
// https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto


Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: Help! How many Megapixels needed?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] OT: Help! How many Megapixels needed?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] OT: Help! How many Megapixels needed?)