Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] SL Review
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:44:35 +0100
References: <15519040.1447860923487.JavaMail.root@elwamui-cypress.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <3FC7B66D-E0C0-4836-AA90-412E277E6DBC@icloud.com> <CA+yJO1DmzZMH-6Fq3v7fOu4AkNK4RUSE2AJwRCjdO2Ev3sqGWA@mail.gmail.com>

But equally important is to weed out the corporate shills. Anybody who has a 
prototype from Leica is an insider in my view, and I certainly take such a 
person?s reviews with a big grain of salt. The most trustworthy reviews are 
by people who buy the equipment like you and I would have to do and have no 
connection with or privileged access to the manufacturer, e.g. Consumer 
Reports.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA













> On 18 Nov 2015, at 17:16, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:
> 
> There are lots of reviews if you just Google Leica SL reviews, but you do
> have to ignore the Leica-haters and there are a lot of them out there!
> 
> Tina



Replies: Reply from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] SL Review)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] SL Review)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] SL Review)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] off list Re: SL Review)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] SL Review)