Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Experimental Photos with Leica SL (to Tina)
From: leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:50:48 -0600
References: <CAE3QcF5Cg6RtmBTLQRVtjqiEv5UFqwnxDnYM2dxv+G4VLa3daQ@mail.gmail.com>

I suppose one day I will have to change but I really don't like EVFs unless 
I'm using live view.  

Leo Wesson
leowesson.com

> On Nov 26, 2015, at 20:22, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi David, I'd like to add a few thoughts to this general topic. Perhaps
> some people are looking at the SL from an M system background. I I don't
> think that where Leica Camera is aiming it. Compared to the high end Canon
> and Nikon bodies and 24-70 the numbers stack up differently. Certainly that
> first lens is large and heavy but then it's AF and image stabilised. The
> first fast prime for the SL though really seems may be more akin to the
> OTUS design for example.
> 
> I guess I'm looking from a less common viewpoint in that after 8 years or
> so with the film and then digital M gear I'm now using the S system almost
> entirely. So when I handled the SL I immediately thought that it felt more
> compact and actually balanced well in my hands with the 24-90.  Maybe D4
> users, for example might have that different perspective too? Controls and
> menu wise, again it is really S through and through.Those are good things.
> 
> I can see the benefits that the EVF brings. I think it will take some
> adjusting to get used to, but it seems likely that this is the future,
> including for the next generation of S bodies too.
> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Lykes Keenan <ausdlk at gmail.com>
>> To: LUGers <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Cc:
>> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:47:26 -0500
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMGS: Experimental Photos with Leica SL (to Tina)
>>> I can use my M and R lenses with this camera.  I HATE Sony's layered menu
>>> options and buttons and wheels.  I have never regretted any Leica
>>> purchase.  I have regretted every Fuji and Sony purchase.
>>> 
>>> I guess I'm Leica's target market.
>> 
>> Tina --
>> 
>> My opinion of the camera may become different once prime lenses become
>> available. I was really put off by the size and weight of the first zoom.
>> As much as I appreciate my a7s, it does feel a bit small in my hand
>> sometimes. The SL with a prime might hit a sweet spot if I choose to
>> justify the price (as I did when buying a Monochrom).
>> 
>> I do like Leica's simplification approach to digital photography. I agree
>> with you about the intensity of all the Japanese cameras' menus, not just
>> the Sony. However, I've found that once the camera is set the way I want,
>> it is rarely necessary to change a menu setting. But, yes, setting it up 
>> at
>> first can be a challenge.
>> 
>> In my brief handling of the SL at PhotoPlus Expo, it definitely has the
>> "it" that makes it a Leica. It was interesting, though, that some of the
>> Leica reps (maybe down toward the M and Q cameras!) were also a bit 
>> baffled
>> about this camera. ;)
>> 
>> .
>> Dave.
>> 
>> --
>> My photography web site <http://www.dlkphotography.com>
>> Like my Facebook page <http://www.facebook.com/dlkphotog>
>> My FAIR WITNESS book <http://www.fair-witness.com> released March 2015
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMGS: Experimental Photos with Leica SL (to Tina))