Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:23:46 -0800
References: <85CF3294-5166-4C64-9317-FBC5683AA90B@gmail.com>

Hi Philippe,
"wow!!!!!!!!! That's about the busiest Christmas morning I've ever seen! :-)
It sure "All hands action stations!!!"  :-)
It  might  a stock photo sale for next Christmas?
cheers,
ted



-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf 
Of
Philippe
Sent: January-02-16 9:51 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?

I was editing my Xmas photos when I hit upon this one which reminded me of
N. Rockwell's compositions, and of E. Hopper's use of artificial light.

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/2015-Noel+__+Mutz-Hoppe
r+CLR-1722.jpg.html

Does it work for you? or not?

All comments and suggestions most welcome.

Amities
Philippe





_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


In reply to: Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)