Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?
From: cummer at netvigator.com (H&ECummer)
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:52:08 +0800
References: <mailman.525.1451785613.2116.lug@leica-users.org>

Hi Philippe,
The positioning of the people and their activity makes it a compelling image.
More Rockwell I think.
Well done.
Howard

From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org 
<mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org>] On Behalf Of
Philippe
Sent: January-02-16 9:51 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?

I was editing my Xmas photos when I hit upon this one which reminded me of
N. Rockwell's compositions, and of E. Hopper's use of artificial light.

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/2015-Noel+__+Mutz-Hoppe 
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/2015-Noel+__+Mutz-Hoppe>
r+CLR-1722.jpg.html

Does it work for you? or not?

All comments and suggestions most welcome.

Amities
Philippe