Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year?
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:41:26 -0600
References: <553a1s00V07g8Sg0153f3K> <5695A161.7040000@cox.net> <5D9P1s00H07g8Sg01D9Qr5>

But Sony didn't have the wood...:)

On 1/12/2016 7:09 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
> This one is a rebadged Sony. Leica's pioneering and successful example in 
> rebadging and increasing the price many fold has not gone unnoticed by 
> others! :-)
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 13-Jan-2016, at 06:29, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> I thought Hasselblad's were good cameras? Used by the astronauts and all 
>> that?
>>
>>> On 1/12/2016 11:03 AM, Robert Baron wrote:
>>> http://photorumors.com/2016/01/11/2015-worst-camera-of-the-year-vote-now/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year?)
In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year?)