Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/03/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nice. I have fond memory of public radio from our time in America, and incredibly, we still have mugs from WHYY in Philadelphia from the early 90s. They have survived several international moves. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 18 Mar 2016, at 09:01, Jeff Moore <jbmmllug at jbm.org> wrote: > > I've used the annual WFMU Fundraising Marathon as an excuse to rent a Leica > SL (and its enormous 24-90mm zoom) for a bit over a week, to cover the > goings-on and see how the camera and I get along. > > The exercise is still in progress, but some observations: > > - This thing is *quick*. I like lots of things about mirrorless cameras, > but every single one I've tried before the SL has been prone to enough > viewing and taking lag that I was never sure about getting a picture of > what I saw happening when I saw it happening. This disappears as an issue > for me with the SL. No viewfinder blackout or freeze while recording a > frame, either. This is the first time this technology has truly seemed > ready for prime time to me. > > - Quick and quiet and quick followup shots are available as soon as I > want them. > > - The user interface and menu structure are initially completely > mysterious (except for the shutter button and zoom ring). If I owned this > I'd spend time poring over the manual and presumably it would reveal its > mysteries, but since I have limited time I'm trying to just pick it up and > use it (with occasional directed searches of a PDF of the manual). This > thing's pretty weird; but with a little bit of learning I can do enough to > take pictures, and the pictures are coming out well. > > - The only available lens is monstrously large - it looks like a bazooka > and feels like a coffee can - and that's even without maintaining a > constant f/2.8 throughout its range. But it's good - really good. The > pictures are looking great, autofocus is fast and usually accurate, > stabilization improves handholding significantly without fuss. f/2.8 is > useful at 24mm, the increased depth of field from the non-optional stopping > down probably doesn't hurt as the lens goes longer; and with good AF and > electrically automatically steady finder brightness and stabilization, some > of the annoyances associated with a variable-aperture zoom seem to > dissipate. I wouldn't want a lens which was ever any slower than f/4.0, > though. > > - I tried some M and R lenses Just Because. Using them is more work than > just cruising along with the autofocus zoom, and the keeper rate dropped, > but they're usable. To get critical focus with f/1.4 lenses, I had to use > finder magnification rather than depend on the focus peaking display. > > Photos I've taken of the Marathon (so far all with the SL) are accumulating > here: > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/jbm0/albums/72157665752167155 > > Technical problems are likely to be on me, not on the camera/lens. Much of > this was in terrible light, and the camera was sometimes auto-ISOing into > some pretty science-fictiony territory, and doing so without calling much > attention to itself (all those details available from the Flickr metadata > display). > > The vast majority of these were taken with the huge 24-90/2.8-4 lens which > is the entire delivered lens system so far. It's monstrous, but very very > good. > > A few have been taken with various M and R lenses I'm bolting on the SL > just to see how they work in that context. We all like for subjects' > eyeballs to be in focus, don't we? Here's the zoom: > > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/jbm0/25572385300/in/album-72157665752167155/ > > ...and here's the 80mm Summilux-R (on stacked adapters, because the R-to-SL > adapter isn't available yet): > > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/jbm0/25778017651/in/album-72157665752167155/ > > So... I rented these partly because I don't expect to be able to afford to > buy them anytime soon. > > If I could afford them, would I buy them? I'd be sorely tempted. I don't > usually like zooms, but I kept using this one and liking the results. I > hate how big the lens is. I find the camera's size pretty comfortable in > my largeish hands (and it would be ridiculous paired with that lens if it > were significantly smaller). I really like the camera's finder and speed > and quiet. I'll be taking more pictures through the weekend and dropping > them into the same Flickr album above. > > Oh, and as for what this whole event I'm documenting is about - it's the > once-a-year on-air fundraiser for the world's finest radio station. You > should all listen in (now, because the Marathon is actually a lot of fun > and there are fabulous giveaways, and later because things will be back to > normal) and definitely donate. Because expertly human-curated music is > necessary to the hungry ear and mind. > > https://wfmu.org/ > > -your pal Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information