[no subject]

Amities
Philippe

Le 22 sept. 2016 ? 22:31, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> a ?crit :

> You are most likely right, but there are (at least) 2 important questions 
> to ask.... can I justify/afford a completely new system to achieve better 
> technical results (an expense of $35+++k). And does my personal style and 
> output NEED these better results
> 
> In my case, and, of course, YMMV, the much considered answer is no.
> 
> I use a Hasselblad 500c with various lenses, and a Leaf Aptus 65 back....  
> the MFDB dates from about 2006. The resultant setup is still more precise 
> than I need.
> 
> Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net
> On Thursday, September 22, 2016, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
> 
> I am afraid to say that Hasselblad V lenses show their limitations on an 
> S, native lenses are far better....
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> A really nice nteresting visual comparison shows the 2 cameras to be quite 
> similar in styling, when viewed head-on.
> 
> Placement of user buttons is almost identical. More interesting is that 
> the SL is actually larger than the GFX, but has the smaller sensor.
> 
> If I were in the MF market, the Leica S family might be higher on my short 
> list. Hard to beat Leica glass....
> 
> Hassy V glass is pretty good too! (And I own it....)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information